Leading U.S. operators are going to the mattresses for a multi-state fight against proposals to increase taxes on mobile sports betting.
Within the first few weeks of 2025, the governors of two major sports-betting markets have proposed to double their tax rates, escalating one of the industry鈥檚 most closely watched policy trends.
Earlier this month, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine released a state budget plan that proposed raising taxes on sports-betting revenue to 40 percent, doubling them for the second time in just three years.
The governor is aiming to use the increased tax revenue to support the funding of new professional sports stadiums and said it would be justified because 鈥淥hio citizens are giving, every single day, millions of dollars to the sports gaming companies鈥.
DeWine鈥檚 move came after Maryland Governor Wes Moore also proposed doubling his state鈥檚 tax rate to 30 percent, again as part of a broader budget package.
Industry observers have been asking whether tax increases will become a wider problem ever since Illinois hiked its tax rate on sports betting last spring, following DeWine鈥檚 and Ohio鈥檚 initial move a year earlier.
There are several factors driving the trend, according to Bob Stoddard, U.S. gaming tax lead and partner at KPMG.
They include an increasing number of states facing structural budget deficits following the end of federal COVID-19 relief programs and now having to consider new revenue sources in anticipation of lower federal outflows under the new Trump administration.
鈥淚 also don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 a coincidence that many states proposing tax-rate increases on OSB [online sports betting] and/or iGaming are directly adjacent or geographically close to New York and Pennsylvania, where the rates are already high,鈥 Stoddard told 天涯海角社区 GamblingCompliance.
鈥淲ith total OSB handle continuing to grow in the larger states, I think some legislators continue to feel that tax-rate increases may not detrimentally affect overall handle and related [gross revenue] taxes are less controversial than other types of tax increases they might otherwise consider.鈥
Lobbying Pushback
Still, major operators are not sitting back and accepting an increased tax burden as an inevitable outcome in 2025.
Speaking with Wall Street analysts on Friday (February 14), DraftKings CEO Jason Robins said the company was not factoring in any tax increases for its forecasted annual earnings this year.
鈥淩ight now, there鈥檚 no reason to bake in higher tax rates because no state has actually increased our tax rate this year,鈥 Robins said.
鈥淥bviously, that鈥檚 something that could change and something that we are very focused on from a government affairs standpoint.鈥
In both Ohio and Maryland, the governor鈥檚 budget plans still have to be reviewed and approved by the state legislature, and there is some cause for optimism that the initial proposals will at least be diluted if not rejected altogether before budget laws are finalized ahead of the new fiscal year starting July 1.
At least one senior Ohio lawmaker 鈥 House finance committee chairman Brian Stewart 鈥 has publicly questioned whether DeWine鈥檚 fellow Republicans will support a second tax increase on sports betting in such quick succession, saying he expected a 鈥渟keptical eyebrow raise鈥 in the legislature.
In Maryland, Bill Hornbuckle, the CEO of BetMGM co-owner MGM Resorts, last week said his company had met directly with Governor Moore about his budget proposal to increase taxes on both sports wagering and casinos鈥 table games.
Hornbuckle suggested that Moore had agreed to back down at least regarding casinos, although he was more circumspect over where things stand on mobile sports betting.
鈥淎s it relates to digital [gaming and sports betting], I think it's going to be an ongoing game,鈥 Hornbuckle said of potential tax increases.
鈥淚 think there are markets that get it. There are markets that want to see true growth and keep it onshore versus offshore 鈥 and there鈥檚 a couple of states I think we'll continue to battle.鈥
All Eyes On Murphy's Budget Law
While there is a long way to go in Ohio and Maryland, it also seems unlikely they will be the only two states to consider tax increases this year.
Lawmakers in Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan and Massachusetts have all filed bills to raise sports-betting taxes in recent months, while it is at least theoretically possible that legislators will seek to add increases as amendments during the course of their state's budgetary process.
A total of 47 states must pass a new budget law this year, with governors in 40 of them having already released their initial budget proposals, according to the Association of State Budget Officers.
One notable exception and an obvious state to watch is New Jersey, where Governor Phil Murphy was reported last week to be considering an increase to taxes on online gambling as one way of filling an estimated $3.7bn budget hole.
New Jersey鈥檚 governor, who will leave office this year, will release his 2025-26 budget plan on February 25.
DraftKings鈥 Robins described the current state of play as being the 鈥渟ausage-making stage鈥 of state legislative sessions.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a whole lot of things that happen between now and when ultimate decisions get made on which states want to move forward with new legislation or anything else 鈥 including tax decisions,鈥 he told analysts.
鈥淲e鈥檙e obviously right in the thick of it with our lobbying team, trying to make sure that we鈥檙e getting our points made and that we鈥檙e helping push forward the policy that we believe is the correct policy, which is to have broad legalization with reasonable regulations and tax rates so that operators like us are able to compete with the ramp-up in the illegal market.鈥
